Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Henry George - Land Value Taxation - Wolf in Sheeps Clothing by Nickglais


Picture Henry George


Henry George (September 2, 1839 – October 29, 1897) was an American writer, politician and political economist ,who was the most influential proponent of the Land Value Tax.
 
Henry George in his book Progress and Poverty tries to marry the interests of the working class with that of the capitalist class against landowners.
 
 
Henry George was an advocate of the free market and free trade against any form of protectionism. He believed in removing taxes from Labour and Capital and placing the burden of tax on landowners.
However whilst most Georgists are self confessed right wingers some on the Left like the Green Party in the UK have also adopted Georgist ideas.

The object of Land Value Taxation is to ensure that the rent attributable to the natural value of the land , and to the value created by its fortunate location, is paid to society as a whole and not to individual landowners.

Whilst the Land Value Taxation ostensible target is the absentee landowner or speculators, LVT would also fall on every landowner however small and they would be under pressure to extract as much profit from their land as possible to pay the tax.

In a capitalist society such pressures would bring undesireable results like ecologically unsound exploitation of forests , peat bogs etc. Also low value properties with a larger acreage than high value properties would suffer from this tax. Land Value Taxation in Urban areas would lead landlords to evicting tenants in persuit of profit and the elimination of low cost urban "Land withheld from use".
There have discussions about a special urban land tax in UK , to stop land speculation, rather than a universal land tax which would be equitable, but it appears to have been abandoned by its proposers as "unworkable" in the UK.

In broader political terms shifting the burden of taxation onto just the landlord and rent diverts the working class from redistributing the other elements of the economic surplus like interest and profit from the capitalist class.

People like UK Liberal Prime Minister David Lloyd George employed Georgist land rhetoric during his famous 1909 Budget.

Henry George was not short on employing racist rhetoric against Chinese workers in USA.
This free market racism from Georgism stays with us to this day which is why we describe Henry George as a wolf in sheeps clothing.

Interest rates by Banking capitalists and profit by Corporates are ring fenced for tax protection by Georgists who do not regard interest on capital or corporate profits as part of the economic surplus like Marxists.

Transaction taxes to reduce Financial market speculation are opposed by Georgeists has would any profits tax on corporates, this exposes the free market fundamentalism of Georgeism who Marx characterised as a "last ditch" defender of free market capitalism.

The new manifestation of Georgeism during the current economic crisis has social roots in the bourgeoisie and is the last ditch ideological defence of capitalism - it also exposes the bourgeois ideological class character of the "Greens" that have embraced Georgism.

4 comments:

Nate Blair said...

Wow... There is literally only one accurate statement in this entire article:

"In a capitalist society such pressures would bring undesireable results like ecologically unsound exploitation of forests , peat bogs etc."

Everything else is false or misunderstood.

nickglais said...

Mr Blair it would be helpful to readers if you expose my inaccuracies on Henry George, rather than cite the one point of agreement.

I think sections of the left have gone soft on Henry George at the time he should be vigourously combated.

nickglais said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Shea Kauffman said...

Since Nate Blair didn't do a very good job of pointing out the inaccuracies, I will.

"most Georgists are self confessed right wingers some on the Left like the Green Party in the UK have also adopted Georgist ideas."

I find this statement doubtful. Most of the people I've heard of tend to be left leaning and libertarian leaning.

"LVT would also fall on every landowner however small and they would be under pressure to extract as much profit from their land as possible to pay the tax."

This is already true for any renter, and you seem to be advocating that one should retain the right to exclude others from the use of property even if it's just so that you can own it.

"In a capitalist society such pressures would bring undesireable results like ecologically unsound exploitation of forests , peat bogs etc."

This is incorrect. Peat Bogs have a Land Value approaching zero, which is why they aren't traded widely as properties already. A Land Value Tax actually concentrates development and resists sprawl.

"Also low value properties with a larger acreage than high value properties would suffer from this tax."

This is incorrect. The assessment is based on the value of the property. A 100 acre plot valued at $1 per acre would have the same tax as a 1 acre plot valued at $100.

"Land Value Taxation in Urban areas would lead landlords to evicting tenants in persuit of profit and the elimination of low cost urban "Land withheld from use"."

Again, I wonder what reasoning could lead you to conclude this. Land withheld from use increases the rent of every other property as it eleminates the use of that land. If Land Lords are attempting to maximize profits they will build more units to overcome the overhead.

"There have discussions about a special urban land tax in UK , to stop land speculation, rather than a universal land tax which would be equitable, but it appears to have been abandoned by its proposers as "unworkable" in the UK."

Land Value Tax, contrary to popular belief, actually helps rural farmers. The number 1 threat to small farmers is land speculation.

"In broader political terms shifting the burden of taxation onto just the landlord and rent diverts the working class from redistributing the other elements of the economic surplus like interest and profit from the capitalist class."

Sure, of course those surpluses when utilized create more demand for labor which increases wages. Henry George didn't like taxing Capital, but I'm indifferent. Right now however the primary tax is on Labor instead of Capital.

"Interest rates by Banking capitalists" If you look into the history of banking it is not only printing money, it also has a long history of massive land grabs. Banks right now control vast quantities of the United States.

What I find rather bothersome is that you didn't appear to actually read Progress & Poverty or study Georgism much because all of the things you bring up are specifically addressed.